The article discusses the recent circular which is issued by International Finance Services Centres Authority (‘IFSCA’) for imposing an obligation on Authorised FMEs, registered FMEs (Non-Retail) and Registered FMEs (Retail) to maintain a website or a webpage dedicated to their fund management activities in the IFSC.
The article discusses the conceptual foundations of the force of attraction rule, traces its judicial evolution in India, and evaluates the relevance of the doctrine in an era increasingly shaped by source-based taxation and digital nexus rules.
The notification of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 2026 (‘2026 Scheme’) with effect from 1 July 2026, was anticipated to settle and provide clarity on the regulatory framework governing international workers under the Code on Social Security, 2020. However, it has done the opposite in one respect. The 2026 Scheme retains a dedicated framework for international workers and carries forward the substance of the erstwhile Paragraph 83 of the EPF Scheme, 1952 (‘1952 Scheme’) and Paragraph 43A of the EPS, 1995.
The article discusses the United Kingdom’s transition review of anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures on electric bicycles from China, where the UK Trade Remedies Authority concluded that continuation of measures on all e-bikes failed the Economic Interest Test. The article examines how the TRA collected and used economic information, how partial-equilibrium modelling was applied to assess different outcomes, and how the TRA’s economic assessment operated alongside the Secretary of State’s decision-making power. It also considers what this approach may offer for the examination of economic interest in Indian trade remedy investigations. According to the authors, it is important for Indian authorities to integrate a more nuanced public or user interest assessment into their final findings, particularly in sectors critical for the economy.
Typically, parties to a rent/lease agreement insert a lock-in period to ensure that either party is unable to terminate the agreement before the stipulated period. Such agreements also incorporate a provision for liquidated damages in the form of rent for the remainder of the lock-in period. The article discusses the jurisprudence on ‘liquidated damages’ in India and its effect on the lock-in-period.
The article discusses on changes made in the Budget 2025 in regards of laboratory chemicals which is covered under Heading 9802 of the Customs Tariff in India, a part of Chapter 98 which is unique to India.
The article discusses the classification and the rate of customs duty on Interactive Flat Panel Displays (IFPDs) as announced in Budget 2025. The authors note that while there is an increase of BCD rate from 10% to 20% on goods classifiable under Tariff Item 8528 59 00, the IFPDs should be correctly classifiable under Heading 8471.
This article analyses the recent judgment delivered by the Kerala High Court in the case of Auto Fit Car Interiors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors., concerning classification of car seat cover and steering cover, made up of textile fabrics and cotton handloom fabrics and its entitlement under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS).
The article discusses a recent decision of the CCI wherein the Competition Commission penalised an Investment Management company and dismissed the claim that subscription to convertible securities should receive differential treatment from acquisition of shares. The CCI was also not persuaded by the argument that the rights package was available to all investors, and should therefore, be considered ordinary shareholder rights.
Certain labelling laws target goods by category - food, drugs, etc., while there are others which target goods based on other aspects like form of packaging (LM Rules) or applicability of quality standards (BIS). As ambit of these laws is varied, a single product might require complying with labelling requirements set out in more than one law. Hence, the labelling requirements prescribed under different laws for the same product is required to be examined.
The article discusses the recent partial stay granted by the NCLAT to the direction issued by the Competition Commission of India to WhatsApp LLC, prohibiting it from sharing user data collected on its Over-the-Top messaging app on the smartphones (WhatsApp application) with other Meta companies for advertising purposes.
The article highlights that while the recent judgment of Supreme Court in Bank of Rajasthan has put to rest the controversy in context of investments made by banks in government securities, the taxability of Broken Period Interest for other taxpayers is far from settled.
The article discusses the Bombay High Court in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra which had ruled that as there is no substantive provision in Section 3 of the CTA that provides for payment of penalty or interest on duty other than BCD, penalty/interest payable on CVD/SAD is not recoverable. The author discusses the subsequent changes by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 and how the issues has now been referred to the Larger Bench.
In the previous issue of LKS BIS Amicus, we threw light upon various aspects of the Product Certification Scheme, i.e. Scheme-I of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The next Scheme listed under the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018 is Scheme-II, also known as the Registration Scheme, and involves self-declaration of conformity. Till date, BIS has issued 6 QCOs under this scheme, covering a total of 73 products.
The article discusses at length the recent decision of the Ministry of Commerce to impose quantitative restrictions on imports of Low Ash Metallurgical Coke which is a crucial raw material for the steel industry that follows production through the blast furnace route. Analysing the notification and the subsequent DGFT Trade Notice, the author discusses various hardships which will be faced by the steel industry...
The article discusses how Banks and financial institutions are leveraging AI in the financial sector for customer onboarding, periodic monitoring, customer engagement, credit risk assessment, cybersecurity and compliance. The authors also discuss the regulatory and compliance risks like issues related to intellectual property, transparency, accountability, contractual risks, data privacy, and cyber risks.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.