The Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) on 12 June 2026, notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) (Third Amendment) Rules, 2026 (‘Amendment Rules’), amending the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (‘NDI Rules’). The Amendment Rules constitute the third amendment in the FEMA liberalisation cycle for the year 2026, following the first and second amendments, which respectively relaxed restrictions on investments from countries sharing a land border with India and liberalised foreign investment in the insurance sector opening the sector up till 100% under automatic route. The third amendment is yet another attempt to widen the gate for the Indian economy. For years, access to India's listed securities market was reserved specially for a defined class amongst which are foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) and non-resident Indians (NRIs) and overseas citizens of India (OCIs), this time the liberalisation is into the Indian capital markets.
The 2026 Steel import Regulation of the European Union (EU) (‘2026 Regulation’),[1] which came into force on 1 July 2026, is not simply a continuation of earlier Steel Safeguard measures[2] applicable since 2018, but it indicates a decisive shift in the EU’s approach to regulate its steel imports in the coming years. With lowering of tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), higher out-of-quota duties and proposal for stricter origin requirements, the 2026 Regulation goes beyond the WTO’s temporary safeguard regime to a more permanent industrial policy governing steel imports into the EU. In particular, the 2026 Regulation reduces the EU's tariff-free steel quota by ~47%, doubles the out-of-quota duty from 25% to 50%, and introduces a new ‘melt and pour’ traceability requirement.
Various State Benches of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘GSTAT’) have recently become operational, and questions relating to jurisdiction between the Principal Bench and the State Benches have begun to arise in practice. While Section 109 of the CGST Act specifies certain categories of cases to be dealt with exclusively by the Principal Bench, early orders of the Principal Bench indicate that jurisdictional issues are not always straightforward.
In the previous issue of LKS BIS Amicus, we threw light upon various aspects of the Product Certification Scheme, i.e. Scheme-I of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The next Scheme listed under the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018 is Scheme-II, also known as the Registration Scheme, and involves self-declaration of conformity. Till date, BIS has issued 6 QCOs under this scheme, covering a total of 73 products.
The article discusses at length the recent decision of the Ministry of Commerce to impose quantitative restrictions on imports of Low Ash Metallurgical Coke which is a crucial raw material for the steel industry that follows production through the blast furnace route. Analysing the notification and the subsequent DGFT Trade Notice, the author discusses various hardships which will be faced by the steel industry...
The article discusses how Banks and financial institutions are leveraging AI in the financial sector for customer onboarding, periodic monitoring, customer engagement, credit risk assessment, cybersecurity and compliance. The authors also discuss the regulatory and compliance risks like issues related to intellectual property, transparency, accountability, contractual risks, data privacy, and cyber risks.
The article discusses a recent change in the definition of ‘Laboratory chemicals’. Elaborately stating the triggering point for the amendment, the true meaning of the term, what is ‘own use’, and the primacy of classification under Heading 9802, the authors state that in its current form, the definition could be a breeding ground for future disputes. According to them, the Government should consider amending the entry of laboratory chemicals to restrict it to certain situations.
The article discusses a recent recommendation of the GST Council in respect of transactions by Free Trading and Warehousing Zones (‘FTWZs’) within their premises, i.e. without exporting or clearing the goods in the Domestic Tariff Area. The authors elaborately discuss the conflict in the light of different AAR Rulings, including the use of different methods of interpretation (strict and purposive) for this purpose.
The article discusses certain unforeseen income-tax implications, on the monies that would be contributed to the Pension Fund, as well as monies that would be receivable from the Pension Fund and Provident Fund. The discussion is limited to the income-tax liability in the hands of the employees on, transfer of balances from PF Scheme to Pension Scheme, contribution to the Pension Scheme from PF Scheme, and on receipt of pension from the Pension Scheme at the time of retirement.
The article discusses a recent dispute wherein a well-known Indian airline has instituted a trademark infringement suit against a reputed Indian car manufacturer, over the use of its alphanumeric mark ‘6E’. Elaborately discussing as to what are alphanumeric and numeral marks, their registrability, Trade Mark Registry’s approach to distinctiveness, and jurisprudence on conflicts over such marks, the authors note that…
The Delhi High Court, in two of its recent decisions, demonstrated disparate approaches of assessing patentability of computer related inventions (CRIs) under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970. Discussing the two decisions, the article highlights that this underscores the complexity and nuanced nature of assessing patentability of CRIs under the Indian patent law.
The article throws light on the essential elements of Scheme-I of the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018, also known as the Product Certification Scheme of BIS. Elaborately discussing the procedures, the authors state that while the procedural aspects demand meticulous compliance, the benefits certainly outweigh.
The article highlight the Indian businesses need to become proactive in understanding the legal obligations, compliance requirements, and commercial implications of the UK CBAM, and assess the same in advance so that they can give a clear picture to their customers in UK on the potential CBAM exposure.
The article explores the legal challenges within the Quick Commerce sector, evaluates India's regulatory readiness, and highlights key legal considerations for these platforms. It is essential to note that these challenges primarily arise owing to the unique features of quick Commerce being supply through dark stores and complex ownership structures. The authors also highlight some potential considerations and solutions.
Elaborately analysing the recent Karnataka HC decision, the authors raise a pertinent question - if the driver-partners can be considered employees of the cab aggregator for the purposes of PoSH Act, basis the level of control and supervision wielded by the cab aggregator, why not for the purposes of employee compensation, state insurance, provident fund, gratuity, leaves, protection as a workman, etc.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.
