The article discusses the recent circular which is issued by International Finance Services Centres Authority (‘IFSCA’) for imposing an obligation on Authorised FMEs, registered FMEs (Non-Retail) and Registered FMEs (Retail) to maintain a website or a webpage dedicated to their fund management activities in the IFSC.
The article discusses the conceptual foundations of the force of attraction rule, traces its judicial evolution in India, and evaluates the relevance of the doctrine in an era increasingly shaped by source-based taxation and digital nexus rules.
The notification of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 2026 (‘2026 Scheme’) with effect from 1 July 2026, was anticipated to settle and provide clarity on the regulatory framework governing international workers under the Code on Social Security, 2020. However, it has done the opposite in one respect. The 2026 Scheme retains a dedicated framework for international workers and carries forward the substance of the erstwhile Paragraph 83 of the EPF Scheme, 1952 (‘1952 Scheme’) and Paragraph 43A of the EPS, 1995.
The article discusses the United Kingdom’s transition review of anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures on electric bicycles from China, where the UK Trade Remedies Authority concluded that continuation of measures on all e-bikes failed the Economic Interest Test. The article examines how the TRA collected and used economic information, how partial-equilibrium modelling was applied to assess different outcomes, and how the TRA’s economic assessment operated alongside the Secretary of State’s decision-making power. It also considers what this approach may offer for the examination of economic interest in Indian trade remedy investigations. According to the authors, it is important for Indian authorities to integrate a more nuanced public or user interest assessment into their final findings, particularly in sectors critical for the economy.
The article discuss the amendment, the potential issues needing clarification and also the global practices being followed for transfer pricing compliance and assessments.
The article discusses the Industry Standards Note on Regulation 30 of SEBI LODR, which clarifies the certain ambiguous disclosure requirements under SEBI LODR and seeks to cure the operational challenges and avoid information asymmetry and this will impact on the quarterly reporting requirements and time to time disclosures to be made by listed companies. This Note effectually makes the disclosure requirements ‘qualitative’ rather than ‘quantitative’ under Regulation SEBI LODR.
The article discusses the key takeaways of the Union Budget 2025 in relation to the Government’s ‘Make in India’ initiative. The Government has sought to further strengthen and boost domestic manufacturing in India and promote export and employment in key sectors like textiles, shipment, toys, electronic vehicles and leather.
The article discusses the recent decision of the Delhi High Court in Niraj Silk Mills which has (re)triggered the debate over the significance of ‘consent’ given at the time of assessment of bill of entry or shipping bill, be it regarding rate of duty / valuation / classification. It focuses on the critical aspect of whether an assessee can challenge an assessment even after giving consent / acceptance in writing.
The Single Judge of the Delhi High Court has rejected claims of trademark infringement and refused a plea seeking to restrain Mahindra Last Mile Mobility Ltd. from selling its electric vehicle under the trademark ‘eZEO’. The dispute was over the trademarks ‘EZIO’ and ‘eZEO’ and highlights the importance of the test of passing off, brand identity, first in the market advantage and weight of established reputation.
The article elaborately discusses the Principle of Comity. Citing various decisions and discussing international jurisprudence, it notes that an orderly disorder has crept into various statutes where multiple authorities have concurrent jurisdiction to decide the same issue and such authorities choose to exercise the same simultaneously, leading to conflicting orders. has context menu
The Supreme Court recently held that the complete reduction of capital (resulting in cancellation of shares) amounts to ‘transfer’ in terms of Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the consequent payout would be exigible to tax under the head capital gains. The article attempts to explore the possible fate of the taxpayers to claim capital loss in a scenario where no payout is received pursuant to a reduction in share capital.
The article discusses a recent proposed amendment in Section 18 of the Customs Act that appears promising on ease of business. On deeper analysis, however, it does pose various questions, as the consequences of non-fulfilment of the timelines proposed are not specified.
The article discusses Alternate Investment Funds (AIFs), which are privately pooled investment vehicles which collect funds from investors, whether Indian or foreign, for investing in certain class of securities. It examines their special taxation regime, the issues with the current provisions, the proposed amendments, and the impacts of these amendments after the Finance Bill, 2025.
The article discusses the scope of the new presumptive taxation scheme which has been proposed for non-residents engaged in providing services or technology in India for setting up electronics manufacturing facility or manufacturing electronic products in India. It discusses the issues which need clarification for the application of the scheme.
The article discusses the Amnesty Scheme, which offers the exporters a one-time opportunity to regularize defaults in export obligations under the Advance Authorization and EPCG schemes. It notes that the loophole of absence of any mention of penalty waiver was cited by Customs Authorities to demand penalty but, recently the CESTAT has held to the contrary.
The article addresses the issue of transnational subsidies in global trade across three sections. The first section examines the present framework of the SCM Agreement. The second section focuses on developments in the European Union (EU) and the United States of America (USA). Finally, the third section discusses the way forward for India.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.