This article examines the evolving exit landscape for PE investors in India, the key regulatory and structural issues that should be addressed well before an exit process is launched, and the practical considerations that can affect deal certainty across the principal exit routes available to investors.
The article discusses the regulatory and compliance risks faced by Global Capability Centers (GCCs) and emphasizes the importance of embedding governance, compliance, and risk management into their operating model from the outset.
The article discusses the principal legal and practical considerations that foreign stakeholders should keep in mind when establishing or scaling a GCC in India.
The article discusses the Bombay High Court’s decision in Blue Cross Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Alto Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., where the Court held that the mark ‘MEFIAL-SPAS’ infringed Blue Cross’s registered pharmaceutical mark ‘MEFTAL-SPAS’. It emphasized that even minor spelling changes can cause deceptive similarity in pharmaceutical products, where confusion may affect public health. The Court also found infringement of copyright and trade dress due to imitation of packaging, colour scheme, and artwork. According to the authors, commercial courts are becoming increasingly ready to make a considerable effort to punish those infringers who act deliberately, fraudulently, and opportunistically.
The article examines how the amendment by the Finance Act, 2026 in the Income-tax Act, 2025 changes the consequences for not-for-profit organisations (‘NPOs’) pursuing general public utility objects. The 2026 amendment removes many breaches from the ‘specified violations’, thus reducing the risk of cancellation. The authors however note that non-compliance may still lead to denial of exemption, taxation of commercial income, and scrutiny of charitable purpose. According to them, the change offers operational flexibility while preserving discipline governing NPOs.
India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (‘DPDP Act’) is now fully operational - the DPDP Rules, 2025 were notified on 13 November 2025 and the substantive obligations become fully enforceable on 13 May 2027.
This article discusses the key regulatory developments, then the principal structuring, diligence and sequencing issues, before turning to tax considerations that should be addressed before a structure is locked in.
This article examines the evolving exit landscape for PE investors in India, the key regulatory and structural issues that should be addressed well before an exit process is launched, and the practical considerations that can affect deal certainty across the principal exit routes available to investors.
The article discusses the regulatory and compliance risks faced by Global Capability Centers (GCCs) and emphasizes the importance of embedding governance, compliance, and risk management into their operating model from the outset.
The article discusses the role of GCCs as an indirect investment channel into the innovation ecosystem. Observing that GCCs have become strategic innovation hubs that identify, engage, validate, and scale emerging technologies developed by Indian startups before a formal investment relationship is established, the author discusses the Key legal and regulatory considerations.
has context menu
The article discusses the principal legal and practical considerations that foreign stakeholders should keep in mind when establishing or scaling a GCC in India.
The article discusses the Bombay High Court’s decision in Blue Cross Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Alto Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., where the Court held that the mark ‘MEFIAL-SPAS’ infringed Blue Cross’s registered pharmaceutical mark ‘MEFTAL-SPAS’. It emphasized that even minor spelling changes can cause deceptive similarity in pharmaceutical products, where confusion may affect public health. The Court also found infringement of copyright and trade dress due to imitation of packaging, colour scheme, and artwork. According to the authors, commercial courts are becoming increasingly ready to make a considerable effort to punish those infringers who act deliberately, fraudulently, and opportunistically.
In a significant liberalisation for FDI in the e-commerce sector, it now appears that the Government intends to lift the prohibition on inventory-based model of e-commerce for the exclusive purpose of boosting exports by domestic manufacturers and MSMEs, in line with the objectives of the Foreign Trade Policy 2023.
The article examines how the amendment by the Finance Act, 2026 in the Income-tax Act, 2025 changes the consequences for not-for-profit organisations (‘NPOs’) pursuing general public utility objects. The 2026 amendment removes many breaches from the ‘specified violations’, thus reducing the risk of cancellation. The authors however note that non-compliance may still lead to denial of exemption, taxation of commercial income, and scrutiny of charitable purpose. According to them, the change offers operational flexibility while preserving discipline governing NPOs.
India’s trade-remedy regime is seeing a marked shift. Affirmative recommendations by the DGTR are increasingly not resulting in duty notifications by the Ministry of Finance. While DGTR findings historically led almost invariably to anti-dumping or countervailing duties, recent data, particularly for late 2025 to mid-2026, shows a sharp rise in non-imposition of duty despite findings of dumping, injury and causal link. The article examines the legal basis for Finance Ministry’s discretion, the lack of publicly articulated reasons in several cases, and the resulting uncertainty for the domestic industry. It argues for greater transparency, institutional clarity and a predictable framework to preserve confidence in India’s trade-remedy system.
India legislated the Indian carbon market through the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022 and re-legislated its entire Income-Tax Code in 2025 but forgot to connect the two. If India wants CCC prices to drive decarbonization and the carbon market to be successful, the tax cost of a tonne of carbon cannot itself be a matter of litigation.
The article discusses the limitation requirement under GST, wherein Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act 2017 prescribe the time limits within which the adjudicating authority is required to pass the order.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.