The article discusses recent CBIC Instruction No. 17/2026-Cus., which permits Customs adjudication under Section 28AAA in certain circumstances without prior DGFT invalidation of licences or scrips.
The article examines the Rajasthan High Court’s recent decision on interest demands for unused goods imported under MOOWR and cleared ‘as such’. It explains that Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 applies only to goods under Section 61(1)(c), not qualifying manufacturing goods under clauses (a) and (b).
In the months of July, August and October, SEBI passed a few settlement orders with respect to alleged violations of SEBI regulations relating to the obligation of the Manager or the Sponsor of the AIF. The article reviews one of such settlement orders passed by SEBI and discusses the various obstacles faced by AIFs and their Managers and Sponsors in complying with SEBI’s regulations for a minimum commitment by the Sponsor or the Manager of an AIF.
The article discusses the IFSCA circular which was issued on 27 October 2026 to impose certification requirements to strengthen cyber security framework. These guidelines require boards and senior management to have adequate cyber risk knowledge and mandated regular employee training.
The article discusses the Special Economic Zones (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2026 which has been notified by Ministry of Commerce and Industry to ease regulatory burden of funds. The changes made by the Amendment Rules are relevant for funds and Fund Management Entities (‘FME’) established in an International Financial Services Centre (‘IFSC’).
Historically, the transfer pricing (‘TP’) regime under Indian tax law has been shaped as much by judicial interpretation as by legislation. Over the years, courts and tribunals played a pivotal role in narrowing the scope of TP applicability by insisting on substantive tests of ownership, control, and demonstrable profit impact. The Income-tax Act, 2025 (‘New Act’), however, marks a conscious departure from this approach.
This article examines the statutory framework governing such powers and analyses the extent to which the reference before the AA can be altered without violating the jurisdictional architecture embedded under the Benami Act.
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (‘DPDPA’) and the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 (‘Rules’) have been published in the Gazette in November 2025. The final implementation of the rules is slated to commence in November 2026 (in respect of the Consent Manager provisions) and May 2027 (in respect of all other provisions of the law) with certain media reports anticipating a reduction of the said timeline to November 2026.
This article aims to analyze how the USDOC reached these outcomes, with focus on adverse-facts-available (‘AFA’), critical circumstances, and the emerging issue of transnational subsidies linked to Chinese-origin inputs.
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (‘DPDP Act’) has altered how mergers and acquisitions are evaluated in India. What was once a routine ‘IT diligence’ item has now become a central driver of deal risk, valuation, and even deal viability in some cases.
Unlike traditional IPOs, SPACs offer a faster and more flexible route to public markets, enabling private companies to negotiate valuation and transaction terms directly with the sponsor rather than relying solely on market driven price discovery.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has proposed amendments to the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 through a public notice dated 8 April 2026, inviting public comments on the draft Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2026.
The recent decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Sangeetha Caterers and Consultants LLP v. Rasnam Foods Pvt Ltd and Ors. represents a watershed moment in Indian intellectual property jurisprudence with respect to the interplay between infringement and passing off in trademark law. Referring to the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the case provides a nuanced exploration of the intersection between franchise contracts, statutory trademark rights, and the common law doctrine of passing off.
The South American Nation of Peru, through its Embassy in New Delhi, filed an application under Section 11 of the Geographical Indication of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1992 (‘Act’), seeking registration of the Geographical Indication (‘GI’) PISCO for an alcoholic beverage manufactured in Peru. The Asociacion De Productores De Pisco A.G. (‘ADP’) filed an opposition against Peru’s application.
This article examines recent initiations across various categories in the light of shifting trends in Indian trade remedy investigations. The article also examines empirical trends across type, nature, country and sectors targeted by these actions.
With the coming into force of the new labour codes on 21 November 2025, the revised definition of ‘wages’ has assumed critical importance for the computation of statutory dues. The definition adopts a bifurcated structure, clearly distinguishing between inclusions and exclusions, and the notional wage amount on the basis of which social security contributions and other statutory benefits are required to be paid.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.