The article discusses the recent circular which is issued by International Finance Services Centres Authority (‘IFSCA’) for imposing an obligation on Authorised FMEs, registered FMEs (Non-Retail) and Registered FMEs (Retail) to maintain a website or a webpage dedicated to their fund management activities in the IFSC.
The article discusses the conceptual foundations of the force of attraction rule, traces its judicial evolution in India, and evaluates the relevance of the doctrine in an era increasingly shaped by source-based taxation and digital nexus rules.
The notification of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 2026 (‘2026 Scheme’) with effect from 1 July 2026, was anticipated to settle and provide clarity on the regulatory framework governing international workers under the Code on Social Security, 2020. However, it has done the opposite in one respect. The 2026 Scheme retains a dedicated framework for international workers and carries forward the substance of the erstwhile Paragraph 83 of the EPF Scheme, 1952 (‘1952 Scheme’) and Paragraph 43A of the EPS, 1995.
The article discusses the United Kingdom’s transition review of anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures on electric bicycles from China, where the UK Trade Remedies Authority concluded that continuation of measures on all e-bikes failed the Economic Interest Test. The article examines how the TRA collected and used economic information, how partial-equilibrium modelling was applied to assess different outcomes, and how the TRA’s economic assessment operated alongside the Secretary of State’s decision-making power. It also considers what this approach may offer for the examination of economic interest in Indian trade remedy investigations. According to the authors, it is important for Indian authorities to integrate a more nuanced public or user interest assessment into their final findings, particularly in sectors critical for the economy.
As an expression of commercial intent, Contracts are far from routine formality and serve as legal instruments that define expectations and allocate risk. In India, the execution and enforcement of contracts is governed by the Contract Act, 1872.
The article delves deep into the question of availability of input tax credit when IGST is paid on imports using TR-6 Challan, i.e., due to various circumstances much after the import.
The article discusses the recent decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in a trademark dispute between an international retail giant and an Indian domestic entity. Ltd. The judgment serves as an important touchstone for the ‘territoriality principle’ in intellectual property law, balancing the rights of global brands against established local businesses.
The article discusses the recent decision of Chhattisgarh HC which holds that export duty exemption is available to the rice exporters irrespective of the mode of realisation of export proceeds. The case highlights the true scope and meaning of the requirement relating to ‘irrevocable Letter of Credit’.
The article discusses what has been laid down by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (‘OECD’) and India’s position and the distinction between the two in determination of a PE in context of remote working arrangements.
The Union Budget 2026 marks a decisive policy shift for the aviation and aerospace sector by placing manufacturing, MRO (maintenance, repair and overhaul), and supply-chain localization at the centre of growth strategy. The most impactful element of this shift is the extension of the customs duty exemptions on aircraft parts, components, and raw materials – aimed at strengthening India’s position as a global aviation manufacturing hub.
India has revised its startup regulatory framework with the aim of supporting innovation and strengthening the startup ecosystem. On 4 February 2026, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (‘DPIIT’), issued Gazette Notification G.S.R. 108(E) (‘New Framework’). This New Framework supersedes the earlier framework issued under G.S.R. 127(E), dated 19 February 2019.
The Variable Capital Company (‘VCC’) model was first conceptualised in Singapore through the Variable Capital Companies Act, 2018. VCC model is a unique corporate structure tailored to support investment funds. VCCs provide a corporate structure which achieves flexibility by treating the issuance of new shares (subscription) and the cancellation of existing shares (redemption) as simple administrative actions without requiring regulatory filings and shareholder approvals, offering a progressive approach for pooling investment funds.
The Advance Ruling framework provided under Chapter VB of the Customs Act, 1962 (‘Customs Act’), serves as an instrument of trade facilitation. As per the framework, an applicant can seek a ruling from Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (‘Authority’) on issues such as classification, valuation, rules of origin, etc, which will be binding on the applicant and the customs department (in respect of such applicant).
The controversy surrounding the levy of customs duty on electrical energy supplied from Special Economic Zones (‘SEZ’) to the Domestic Tariff Area (‘DTA’) has resulted in more than a decade of litigation. While many assessees have been facing the issue, the case of Adani Power was dealt with primarily before the Courts. The aftermath of the legal battle led to significant reassertion of constitutional principles in taxation disputes.
The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), on 4 February 2026, issued Notification G.S.R. 108(E). The Notification G.S.R. 108(E) redefines the criteria and recognition process for Startups and Deep Tech Startups in India. Said notification not only supersedes the earlier Gazette Notification G.S.R. 127(E) dated 19th February 2019 but also marks a significant policy evolution in India’s innovation ecosystem.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.