The article discusses recent CBIC Instruction No. 17/2026-Cus., which permits Customs adjudication under Section 28AAA in certain circumstances without prior DGFT invalidation of licences or scrips.
The article examines the Rajasthan High Court’s recent decision on interest demands for unused goods imported under MOOWR and cleared ‘as such’. It explains that Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 applies only to goods under Section 61(1)(c), not qualifying manufacturing goods under clauses (a) and (b).
In the months of July, August and October, SEBI passed a few settlement orders with respect to alleged violations of SEBI regulations relating to the obligation of the Manager or the Sponsor of the AIF. The article reviews one of such settlement orders passed by SEBI and discusses the various obstacles faced by AIFs and their Managers and Sponsors in complying with SEBI’s regulations for a minimum commitment by the Sponsor or the Manager of an AIF.
The article discusses the IFSCA circular which was issued on 27 October 2026 to impose certification requirements to strengthen cyber security framework. These guidelines require boards and senior management to have adequate cyber risk knowledge and mandated regular employee training.
The article discusses the Special Economic Zones (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2026 which has been notified by Ministry of Commerce and Industry to ease regulatory burden of funds. The changes made by the Amendment Rules are relevant for funds and Fund Management Entities (‘FME’) established in an International Financial Services Centre (‘IFSC’).
The article discusses certain unforeseen income-tax implications, on the monies that would be contributed to the Pension Fund, as well as monies that would be receivable from the Pension Fund and Provident Fund. The discussion is limited to the income-tax liability in the hands of the employees on, transfer of balances from PF Scheme to Pension Scheme, contribution to the Pension Scheme from PF Scheme, and on receipt of pension from the Pension Scheme at the time of retirement.
The article discusses a recent dispute wherein a well-known Indian airline has instituted a trademark infringement suit against a reputed Indian car manufacturer, over the use of its alphanumeric mark ‘6E’. Elaborately discussing as to what are alphanumeric and numeral marks, their registrability, Trade Mark Registry’s approach to distinctiveness, and jurisprudence on conflicts over such marks, the authors note that…
The Delhi High Court, in two of its recent decisions, demonstrated disparate approaches of assessing patentability of computer related inventions (CRIs) under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970. Discussing the two decisions, the article highlights that this underscores the complexity and nuanced nature of assessing patentability of CRIs under the Indian patent law.
The article throws light on the essential elements of Scheme-I of the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018, also known as the Product Certification Scheme of BIS. Elaborately discussing the procedures, the authors state that while the procedural aspects demand meticulous compliance, the benefits certainly outweigh.
The article highlight the Indian businesses need to become proactive in understanding the legal obligations, compliance requirements, and commercial implications of the UK CBAM, and assess the same in advance so that they can give a clear picture to their customers in UK on the potential CBAM exposure.
The article explores the legal challenges within the Quick Commerce sector, evaluates India's regulatory readiness, and highlights key legal considerations for these platforms. It is essential to note that these challenges primarily arise owing to the unique features of quick Commerce being supply through dark stores and complex ownership structures. The authors also highlight some potential considerations and solutions.
Elaborately analysing the recent Karnataka HC decision, the authors raise a pertinent question - if the driver-partners can be considered employees of the cab aggregator for the purposes of PoSH Act, basis the level of control and supervision wielded by the cab aggregator, why not for the purposes of employee compensation, state insurance, provident fund, gratuity, leaves, protection as a workman, etc.
The article discusses Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, which empowers the department to block ITC ledger in cases involving fake ITC. Observing that greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse; and it is no different in the case of said Rule, the authors deliberate on various case law on number of issues including on ‘borrowed satisfaction’, ‘temporary measure’, ‘negative blocking’, etc.
Ordinarily in the case of a sale, the price received by a seller should be taken as the ‘full value of the consideration’ for calculating capital gains. However, a legal quandary arises in the cases where a portion of the consideration is retained in an escrow account. Taking note of various case law, the article ponders over the questions as to whether such retained amount falls within the purview of ‘full value of the consideration’ and what would be the year of its taxation
Bearing in mind the existing provisions for expedited examinations, the article focuses on key routes available at the Indian Patent Office (‘IPO’) compared with the European Patent Office (‘EPO’) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (‘USPTO’).
The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023, and the Biological Diversity Rules, 2024, which will come into effect after 21 December 2024, provide an orchestration for management of India’s biological resources with due consideration to the interests of stakeholders as well as the local communities.
The article highlights ten distinct conformity assessment schemes, each aimed at facilitating compliance with Indian Standards (IS) across various sectors and analysis their legal scope, and significant updates.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.