The article discusses recent CBIC Instruction No. 17/2026-Cus., which permits Customs adjudication under Section 28AAA in certain circumstances without prior DGFT invalidation of licences or scrips.
The article examines the Rajasthan High Court’s recent decision on interest demands for unused goods imported under MOOWR and cleared ‘as such’. It explains that Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 applies only to goods under Section 61(1)(c), not qualifying manufacturing goods under clauses (a) and (b).
In the months of July, August and October, SEBI passed a few settlement orders with respect to alleged violations of SEBI regulations relating to the obligation of the Manager or the Sponsor of the AIF. The article reviews one of such settlement orders passed by SEBI and discusses the various obstacles faced by AIFs and their Managers and Sponsors in complying with SEBI’s regulations for a minimum commitment by the Sponsor or the Manager of an AIF.
The article discusses the IFSCA circular which was issued on 27 October 2026 to impose certification requirements to strengthen cyber security framework. These guidelines require boards and senior management to have adequate cyber risk knowledge and mandated regular employee training.
The article discusses the Special Economic Zones (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2026 which has been notified by Ministry of Commerce and Industry to ease regulatory burden of funds. The changes made by the Amendment Rules are relevant for funds and Fund Management Entities (‘FME’) established in an International Financial Services Centre (‘IFSC’).
The article discusses the classification and the rate of customs duty on Interactive Flat Panel Displays (IFPDs) as announced in Budget 2025. The authors note that while there is an increase of BCD rate from 10% to 20% on goods classifiable under Tariff Item 8528 59 00, the IFPDs should be correctly classifiable under Heading 8471.
This article analyses the recent judgment delivered by the Kerala High Court in the case of Auto Fit Car Interiors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors., concerning classification of car seat cover and steering cover, made up of textile fabrics and cotton handloom fabrics and its entitlement under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS).
The article discusses a recent decision of the CCI wherein the Competition Commission penalised an Investment Management company and dismissed the claim that subscription to convertible securities should receive differential treatment from acquisition of shares. The CCI was also not persuaded by the argument that the rights package was available to all investors, and should therefore, be considered ordinary shareholder rights.
Certain labelling laws target goods by category - food, drugs, etc., while there are others which target goods based on other aspects like form of packaging (LM Rules) or applicability of quality standards (BIS). As ambit of these laws is varied, a single product might require complying with labelling requirements set out in more than one law. Hence, the labelling requirements prescribed under different laws for the same product is required to be examined.
The article discusses the recent partial stay granted by the NCLAT to the direction issued by the Competition Commission of India to WhatsApp LLC, prohibiting it from sharing user data collected on its Over-the-Top messaging app on the smartphones (WhatsApp application) with other Meta companies for advertising purposes.
The article highlights that while the recent judgment of Supreme Court in Bank of Rajasthan has put to rest the controversy in context of investments made by banks in government securities, the taxability of Broken Period Interest for other taxpayers is far from settled.
The article discusses the Bombay High Court in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra which had ruled that as there is no substantive provision in Section 3 of the CTA that provides for payment of penalty or interest on duty other than BCD, penalty/interest payable on CVD/SAD is not recoverable. The author discusses the subsequent changes by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 and how the issues has now been referred to the Larger Bench.
In the previous issue of LKS BIS Amicus, we threw light upon various aspects of the Product Certification Scheme, i.e. Scheme-I of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The next Scheme listed under the BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018 is Scheme-II, also known as the Registration Scheme, and involves self-declaration of conformity. Till date, BIS has issued 6 QCOs under this scheme, covering a total of 73 products.
The article discusses at length the recent decision of the Ministry of Commerce to impose quantitative restrictions on imports of Low Ash Metallurgical Coke which is a crucial raw material for the steel industry that follows production through the blast furnace route. Analysing the notification and the subsequent DGFT Trade Notice, the author discusses various hardships which will be faced by the steel industry...
The article discusses how Banks and financial institutions are leveraging AI in the financial sector for customer onboarding, periodic monitoring, customer engagement, credit risk assessment, cybersecurity and compliance. The authors also discuss the regulatory and compliance risks like issues related to intellectual property, transparency, accountability, contractual risks, data privacy, and cyber risks.
The article discusses a recent change in the definition of ‘Laboratory chemicals’. Elaborately stating the triggering point for the amendment, the true meaning of the term, what is ‘own use’, and the primacy of classification under Heading 9802, the authors state that in its current form, the definition could be a breeding ground for future disputes. According to them, the Government should consider amending the entry of laboratory chemicals to restrict it to certain situations.
The article discusses a recent recommendation of the GST Council in respect of transactions by Free Trading and Warehousing Zones (‘FTWZs’) within their premises, i.e. without exporting or clearing the goods in the Domestic Tariff Area. The authors elaborately discuss the conflict in the light of different AAR Rulings, including the use of different methods of interpretation (strict and purposive) for this purpose.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.