The article discusses the recent circular which is issued by International Finance Services Centres Authority (‘IFSCA’) for imposing an obligation on Authorised FMEs, registered FMEs (Non-Retail) and Registered FMEs (Retail) to maintain a website or a webpage dedicated to their fund management activities in the IFSC.
The article discusses the conceptual foundations of the force of attraction rule, traces its judicial evolution in India, and evaluates the relevance of the doctrine in an era increasingly shaped by source-based taxation and digital nexus rules.
The notification of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 2026 (‘2026 Scheme’) with effect from 1 July 2026, was anticipated to settle and provide clarity on the regulatory framework governing international workers under the Code on Social Security, 2020. However, it has done the opposite in one respect. The 2026 Scheme retains a dedicated framework for international workers and carries forward the substance of the erstwhile Paragraph 83 of the EPF Scheme, 1952 (‘1952 Scheme’) and Paragraph 43A of the EPS, 1995.
The article discusses the United Kingdom’s transition review of anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures on electric bicycles from China, where the UK Trade Remedies Authority concluded that continuation of measures on all e-bikes failed the Economic Interest Test. The article examines how the TRA collected and used economic information, how partial-equilibrium modelling was applied to assess different outcomes, and how the TRA’s economic assessment operated alongside the Secretary of State’s decision-making power. It also considers what this approach may offer for the examination of economic interest in Indian trade remedy investigations. According to the authors, it is important for Indian authorities to integrate a more nuanced public or user interest assessment into their final findings, particularly in sectors critical for the economy.
Adopting AI is as much a legal and governance undertaking as a technical one, and the legal questions tend to arrive in a predictable order, from what the law permits through to disputes.
Subhomoy Bakshi, Head of Digital Transformation27 Sept 2025
There is no single statute a company can read to become compliant with AI. There is instead a patchwork of two kinds of law: older rules that reach AI because they reach everything, and AI-specific statutes.
Subhomoy Bakshi, Head of Digital Transformation24 Sept 2025
Governance principles are written for the board. An AI usage policy is written for the employee who, under deadline, is deciding whether to paste a client contract into a public chatbot.
Subhomoy Bakshi, Head of Digital Transformation20 Sept 2025
An AI project rarely fails because the model was bad. It fails because no one had decided, in advance, who owned the risk, what it would cost to keep the system honest, and who paid when a vendor's tool erred.
Subhomoy Bakshi, Head of Digital Transformation17 Sept 2025
A company that decides to adopt AI has really made only the first of two decisions. The second, and often the more consequential, is whether to buy the capability from a vendor or build it in-house.
Subhomoy Bakshi, Head of Digital Transformation13 Sept 2025
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.