The article discusses recent CBIC Instruction No. 17/2026-Cus., which permits Customs adjudication under Section 28AAA in certain circumstances without prior DGFT invalidation of licences or scrips.
The article examines the Rajasthan High Court’s recent decision on interest demands for unused goods imported under MOOWR and cleared ‘as such’. It explains that Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 applies only to goods under Section 61(1)(c), not qualifying manufacturing goods under clauses (a) and (b).
In the months of July, August and October, SEBI passed a few settlement orders with respect to alleged violations of SEBI regulations relating to the obligation of the Manager or the Sponsor of the AIF. The article reviews one of such settlement orders passed by SEBI and discusses the various obstacles faced by AIFs and their Managers and Sponsors in complying with SEBI’s regulations for a minimum commitment by the Sponsor or the Manager of an AIF.
The article discusses the IFSCA circular which was issued on 27 October 2026 to impose certification requirements to strengthen cyber security framework. These guidelines require boards and senior management to have adequate cyber risk knowledge and mandated regular employee training.
The article discusses the Special Economic Zones (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2026 which has been notified by Ministry of Commerce and Industry to ease regulatory burden of funds. The changes made by the Amendment Rules are relevant for funds and Fund Management Entities (‘FME’) established in an International Financial Services Centre (‘IFSC’).
The article discusses unsettled issues related to biodiversity compliances, which introduces unnecessary complexity and discourages research, ultimately disincentivizing Applicants from seeking patent protection in India.
The article discusses issues relating to ownership, valuation, and penalty thresholds for non-disclosure of foreign assets in the income tax returns, under Sections 42 and 43 of the Black Money Act.
The article discusses the recently notified Telecommunications (Telecom Cyber Security) Amendment Rules, 2025 by the Department of Telecommunications (‘DoT’) in October 2025. These Amendments introduce sweeping obligations for businesses that rely on telecom identifiers, new mechanisms for mobile number verification, and stricter International Mobile Equipment Identity (‘IMEI’) oversight.
The article discusses the Warranty and Indemnity (W&I) insurance, which protects buyers or sellers from financial losses due to warranty breaches in M&A deals. It analyses synthetic W&I insurance, a newer option for distressed deals, where warranties are negotiated between the policyholder and insurer, unlike a traditional W&I policy which relies on warranties negotiated between the buyer and the seller.
The article discusses the recently notified Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 which have set clear timelines for enforcement of DPDP Act, 2023 and Rules. While the DPDP Rules do not, in large part, deviate from the MEITY’s draft rules released in January (‘Draft Rules’), the author outlined the key changes under these Rules, as well as the way ahead for the law.
On 13 November, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (‘MEITY’) notified the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 (‘DPDP Rules’) and set out clear timelines for enforcement of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (‘DPDPA’) and the DPDP Rules. While the DPDP Rules do not, in large part, deviate from the MEITY’s draft rules released in January (‘Draft Rules’), we have outlined the key changes under these Rules, as well as the way ahead for the law.
This article discusses the legal foundation of the first sale principle, its practical application, and its potential role as a compliance-based tool for managing tariff exposure in a changing trade policy environment.
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology’s release of the Draft Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2025 is another spoke in the wheel of regulating internet aspects through the ‘intermediary’ route under the Information Technology Act, 2000.
In a globalised economy, standardization and regulation play a pivotal role in ensuring product safety, fair trade, and compliance with trade practices.
The article discusses how the GAAR framework has recently seen its application tested by the Telangana High Court through two consequential, yet contrasting, rulings.
The article discusses the recent decision of Madras High Court in case of A. Ruthramoorthy and Ors. v. P. Moorthy and Ors. The case unfolded as a nuanced examination of statutory interpretation, legislative intent, and judicial precedent highlighting the complex interplay between copyright and design regimes in Indian intellectual property law.
The article discusses the recent decision of Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in the case of Carlton Shoes Ltd. v. VIP Industries Ltd. The Court delivered a significant verdict upholding the primacy of territorial goodwill over global reputation, while also holding that goodwill attaches to the mark as a whole, not just to a specific category of goods.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.