The Delhi High Court has held that requirement of 10% pre-deposit for filing appeal to the Appellate Authority in cases involving only penalty is not applicable for the cases where the SCNs have been issued before 1 October 2025, the date of coming into force of the amendment to Section 107(6) requiring 10% pre-deposit.
The Court in Gaurav Jain & Anr. v. Joint Commissioner noted the following:
• Right to carry the proceedings in appeal exists as a component of the legal proceeding before the original authority renders its decision.
• Material event is the date of SCN (25 June 2025) invoking penalty provisions under Section 122(1A).
• Submission of replies and participation in the personal hearing after 1 October 2025 does not postpone the commencement of the proceedings.
• Substituted proviso diminishes the appellate package attached to the proceedings on 25 June 2025.
• Neither Section 129 of the Finance Act, 2025 nor the substituted proviso states that the new condition shall apply to adjudicatory proceedings pending on 1 October 2025.
• Absence of any transitional provisions.
• Substitution does not by itself divest rights which had already accrued under the earlier law.
• Department’s reliance of the words ‘no appeal shall be filed’, was also rejected by relying on Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hoosein Kasam Dada.
• Absence of an express saving clause would not aid the Department, since SC in Videocon holds that non-retrospective amendments do not affect rights and obligations crystallised at commencement of the lis, unless expressly or necessarily intended otherwise.
• Legislative intention to impair a vested appellate right cannot be inferred merely from the fact that the amendment is expressed in general terms.
• Fact that the petitioners initially sought waiver or reduction of the pre deposit does not determine the statutory regime applicable to their appeals.
Related Articles
Discuss this topic with our GST & Indirect Tax Litigation team
Contact Us



