Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan logo
Indirect Tax Amicus, April 2026

Indirect Tax Amicus, April 2026

30 Apr 20263 min read


Read full newsletter in pdf here above.

Goods and Services Tax (GST)

Notifications and Circulars 

  • GSTAT Delhi State Bench commences operation
  • GSTAT Chennai Bench commences operation
  • GSTAT Hyderabad Bench commences operation – Registrar Court functional from 20 April for rectification of defects
  • GSTAT Agra Bench commences operation 

Ratio decidendi 

  • Detention and seizure during transit – State Proper Officer cannot discharge such functions under IGST Act where origin and culmination of sales is outside said State – Andhra Pradesh High Court
  • Detention during transit – Timelines under Section 129(3), for issuance of notice and passing of order, are directory and not mandatory; Proper Officer however to explain reasons for delay – Allahabad High Court
  • ITC fraud – Cancellation of supplier’s registration cannot solely be the basis for cancellation of buyer’s registration – Bombay High Court
  • ITC fraud – Alert notice of non-existence of supplier is not enough to deny ITC to buyer – Orissa High Court
  • Consolidated show cause notice for multiple financial years/tax periods – Bombay High Court refers issue to its Larger Bench
  • Demand invoking Section 76 is not justified when tax is paid through another distinct person in same State – Madras High Court
  • Recovery of tax dues from Bank of assessee – Section 79 does not require issuance of notice to defaulting assessee – Andhra Pradesh High Court
  • Import of goods – Jurisdiction to levy, assess and collect IGST vests only with Customs authorities – Andhra Pradesh High Court
  • Personal hearing is mandatory even if ‘no personal hearing’ selected by assessee in reply – Gujarat High Court
  • GSTAT – Online transfer of case mistakenly filed before Principal Bench to State Bench – Directions issued to Registry, GSTN and NIC teams – GSTAT Principal Bench
     

Customs and FTP

Notifications and Circulars 

  • RoDTEP and RoSCTL – Specified benefits in line with Drawback made available
  • SEZ supplies to DTA – Concessional customs duty notified for one year
  • Re-exports from DTA to SEZ – Drawback available
  • Petrochemicals – Customs duties reduced till June 2026
  • E-commerce – Ease of doing exports through courier mode

Ratio decidendi

  • Extra-territorial applicability of Customs Act – Amendment made in 2018 is not retrospective and is only for a limited extent – Bombay High Court
  • RoDTEP – Goods not totally ‘restricted’ if appropriate quota allows export subject to certain approval – Bombay High Court
  • Customs department cannot redetermine FOB value of exports to curtail Drawback and MEIS benefit – CESTAT New Delhi
  • Import at concessional rate of duty for specific purpose – Non-compliance with IGCR Rules when is not fatal – CESTAT Chennai
  • Provisional release of goods imported without import authorization and required registration with BIS – Such goods not prohibited per se but only deemed prohibited – CESTAT Chandigarh
     

Central Excise, Service Tax and VAT

Ratio decidendi 

  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme – Unilateral rectification of Form SVLDRS-3 by the Department to enhance demand is wrong – Supreme Court
  • ’Earthen roofing tiles’ are covered under ’pottery’ – Exemption to certain products manufactured by units approved by Khadi Board to be interpreted purposively – Kerala High Court
  • Conversion of waste PET bottles into PET flakes is not ‘manufacture’ – CESTAT Chennai
  • Cenvat credit – Proportionate reversal on common inputs – Formula prescribed from 1 April 2011 can be used for the period before April 2011 – CESTAT Chandigarh
Check out our GST knowledge portal

Discuss this topic with our GST & Indirect Tax Litigation team

Contact Us
CallEmail