Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan logo

Articles

c
General CorporateAll Industries+1

Widening the gate of Indian Economy: Key changes under the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) (Third Amendment) Rules, 2026

The Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) on 12 June 2026, notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) (Third Amendment) Rules, 2026 (‘Amendment Rules’), amending the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (‘NDI Rules’). The Amendment Rules constitute the third amendment in the FEMA liberalisation cycle for the year 2026, following the first and second amendments, which respectively relaxed restrictions on investments from countries sharing a land border with India and liberalised foreign investment in the insurance sector opening the sector up till 100% under automatic route. The third amendment is yet another attempt to widen the gate for the Indian economy. For years, access to India's listed securities market was reserved specially for a defined class amongst which are foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) and non-resident Indians (NRIs) and overseas citizens of India (OCIs), this time the liberalisation is into the Indian capital markets.

Aman Gupta04 Aug 2026
EU’s 2026 Steel TRQ Regulation: From temporary safeguards to permanent industrial policy?
International Trade and WTOMetals

EU’s 2026 Steel TRQ Regulation: From temporary safeguards to permanent industrial policy?

The 2026 Steel import Regulation of the European Union (EU) (‘2026 Regulation’),[1] which came into force on 1 July 2026, is not simply a continuation of earlier Steel Safeguard measures[2] applicable since 2018, but it indicates a decisive shift in the EU’s approach to regulate its steel imports in the coming years. With lowering of tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), higher out-of-quota duties and proposal for stricter origin requirements, the 2026 Regulation goes beyond the WTO’s temporary safeguard regime to a more permanent industrial policy governing steel imports into the EU. In particular, the 2026 Regulation reduces the EU's tariff-free steel quota by ~47%, doubles the out-of-quota duty from 25% to 50%, and introduces a new ‘melt and pour’ traceability requirement.

10 Jul 2026
Jurisdiction of Principal Bench of GST Appellate Tribunal: Statutory framework and early judicial signals
GST & Indirect Tax LitigationAll Industries

Jurisdiction of Principal Bench of GST Appellate Tribunal: Statutory framework and early judicial signals

Various State Benches of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘GSTAT’) have recently become operational, and questions relating to jurisdiction between the Principal Bench and the State Benches have begun to arise in practice. While Section 109 of the CGST Act specifies certain categories of cases to be dealt with exclusively by the Principal Bench, early orders of the Principal Bench indicate that jurisdictional issues are not always straightforward.

Shreyash Agrawal+101 Jul 2026

Search Articles

  • All PracticesAll Industries

    The ‘Mutuality’ of a mutually agreed solution under the DSU

    The article discusses an interesting proposition which arose in a recent dispute before the WTO’s DSB in the case United States - Tariff Measures on Certain Goods from China (DS543). According to the author, the Panel has clarified that for a solution to be accepted as a mutually agreed solution within the meaning of Article 12.7, the solution must be acceptable to both parties, i.e. should be mutual, and must resolve the issue at hand.

    30 Sept 2020
  • GST ConsultancyAutomobiles & Components

    Tata Motors’ AAR decision: A fix to the age-old strife?

    Employee recoveries have always been a contentious issue, both in pre-GST era and under GST. The article elaborately analysis a recent decision of Maharashtra AAR in the case of Tata Motors, where the Authority has held that the provision of bus facilities by the employer to the employee on a nominal price falls under ‘employer-employee’ relation and is not a ‘supply’. Analysing whether the said ruling will be beneficial for the assessees, the author discusses the effect on other doctrines

    Tanya Garg25 Sept 2020
  • Direct TaxAll Industries

    TCS on sale of goods – Practical nightmare

    Sub-section (1H) introduced in Section 206 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 2020, seeks to extend the ambit of Tax Collection at Source (‘TCS’) to consideration received from sale of goods. The article seeks to address certain practical issues that would be faced by tax payers in following the law effective from 1-10-2020. It discusses that the meaning of ‘goods’ must be derived from the Sale of Goods Act and not from…

    S. Sriram21 Sept 2020
  • General CorporateAll Industries

    Understanding cross border social security obligations

    The article notes that many countries with which India has SSAs have clarified that the work from home scenarios arising out of COVID-19 would not be considered for determining the eligibility of payment of social security obligations, but in the absence of any clarification from Employees Provident Fund Organisation, there exists an ambiguity on the status of foreign workers who are currently working remotely from their home country…

    Kumar Panda14 Sept 2020
  • Intellectual PropertyAll Industries+4

    Patents – Patentability with respect to inventive step and proof of right

    In this case [Stempeutics Research Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs ], the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (‘IPAB’) adjudicated patentability with respect to inventive step under Sections 2(1)(ja) and 3(e) of the Patents Act, 1970 (‘Act’). The IPAB also addressed the issue of submission of proof of right under Section 7(2) of the Act.

    the IPR team in Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan+113 Sept 2020
  • Intellectual PropertyAll Industries+4

    Trademarks – Prior use holds precedence over prior registration

    In the present case [Mandom Corp v. Fem Care Pharma Limited & Ors. ], the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“IPAB”) examined one aspect of the often ambiguous issue in trademark law of prior use versus prior registration. It also clarified certain procedural law principles like res judicata, locus standi, and burden of proof.

    10 Sept 2020
  • Intellectual PropertyAll Industries+4

    Trademarks “Your Wings to Life” and “Gives You Wings” are neither deceptively similar nor identical

    In the present case [Red Bull AG v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited & Ors. ], the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“IPAB”), determined whether a registered trademark of a sub-brand, if not in use, can be removed from the trademark register on the request of a non-aggrieved party.

    10 Sept 2020
  • International Trade and WTOAll Industries

    Suspension of lesser duty rule by the EU in anti-dumping investigations

    The lesser duty rule may be suspended by the EU if there are distortions of raw materials price. Moreover, as per Article 7(2a), the lesser duty rule can only be suspended when a single raw material for which distortion is found accounts for not less than 17% of the cost of production of the product concerned. After these requirements of Article 7(2a) are met, it still has to go through the rigours of the Union interest test.

    Vikrant Nehra28 Aug 2020
  • All PracticesAll Industries

    CCI’s changed approach to enforcement amidst the pandemic

    The Competition Commission of India’s (“CCI”) regular functioning continues to stand suspended amid the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020. The Indian antitrust regulator however was quick to adapt to the changed circumstances and adopted a modus operandi which allowed for parties to submit merger notifications as well as responses in on-going investigations and new informations online.

    26 Aug 2020
  • GST ConsultancyAll Industries

    Contractual payment = Consideration?

    The article elaborately discusses the thin line which a payment needs to cross in order to become a consideration. Discussing the definitions of ‘consideration’ under GST law and Indian Contract Act, 1872, the article states that payment should have a direct and sufficient nexus with the supply and be at the desire of the promisor.

    Mansi Goel26 Aug 2020
  • GST ConsultancyAll Industries+1

    ‘Intermediary’ – Mediating required for intermediary

    The article discusses at length the issue as to whether an intermediary suppling service to a foreign customer should discharge CGST+SGST or IGST. The authors are of the view that in such case, the transaction would be covered under Section 13(8)(c) and be deemed as inter-State supply as per Section 7(5)(c). They also state that the Gujarat High Court’s observation in the case of Material Recycling Association of India, that CGST+SGST would be liable in such case, is a mere obiter dicta.

    26 Aug 2020
  • Direct TaxAll Industries

    Doctrine of Merger and its application to orders passed under Income Tax Act

    Doctrine of Merger is not applicable in all scenarios and to all the orders passed under the Income Tax Act. The Courts have been playing a vital role by applying this doctrine on case to case basis to determine whether or not the powers under Section 263 and 154 have been exercised within the time limits prescribed and also in certain cases to determine if the appeals have been filed within the condonable period.

    Abhinov Vaidyanathan18 Aug 2020
Complete archive