The Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) on 12 June 2026, notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) (Third Amendment) Rules, 2026 (‘Amendment Rules’), amending the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (‘NDI Rules’). The Amendment Rules constitute the third amendment in the FEMA liberalisation cycle for the year 2026, following the first and second amendments, which respectively relaxed restrictions on investments from countries sharing a land border with India and liberalised foreign investment in the insurance sector opening the sector up till 100% under automatic route. The third amendment is yet another attempt to widen the gate for the Indian economy. For years, access to India's listed securities market was reserved specially for a defined class amongst which are foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) and non-resident Indians (NRIs) and overseas citizens of India (OCIs), this time the liberalisation is into the Indian capital markets.
The 2026 Steel import Regulation of the European Union (EU) (‘2026 Regulation’),[1] which came into force on 1 July 2026, is not simply a continuation of earlier Steel Safeguard measures[2] applicable since 2018, but it indicates a decisive shift in the EU’s approach to regulate its steel imports in the coming years. With lowering of tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), higher out-of-quota duties and proposal for stricter origin requirements, the 2026 Regulation goes beyond the WTO’s temporary safeguard regime to a more permanent industrial policy governing steel imports into the EU. In particular, the 2026 Regulation reduces the EU's tariff-free steel quota by ~47%, doubles the out-of-quota duty from 25% to 50%, and introduces a new ‘melt and pour’ traceability requirement.
Various State Benches of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘GSTAT’) have recently become operational, and questions relating to jurisdiction between the Principal Bench and the State Benches have begun to arise in practice. While Section 109 of the CGST Act specifies certain categories of cases to be dealt with exclusively by the Principal Bench, early orders of the Principal Bench indicate that jurisdictional issues are not always straightforward.
Finance Bill, 2022 has brought in certain amendments with an intent to augment revenue and one such amendment is fetched into Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’).
The article examines the recent Final Findings issued by the DGTR in the Mid-Term Review of countervailing duty on imports of Welded Stainless-Steel Pipes and Tubes (‘product under consideration’, ‘PUC’) from China PR and Vietnam. The author elaborately discusses the three reasons as listed by the DGTR while rejecting exclusion of specific grades of the PUC compliant with American Society of Mechanical Engineers-Bioprocessing Equipment (ASME-BPE) standards.
The article highlights the changes in entries relating to electric vehicles (‘EV’) and their probable impact on the EV ecosystem in India. Discussing the amendments made by a notification issued as part of Budget 2022 proposals, the authors point out that though there is no change in the rate of duty, the changes carried out in the description in context of the form and the manner in which the goods are to be imported is likely to cause muddle among the industry and the field formations.
The article analyses Section 34 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 which keeps on a higher ground the rights of a prior user of the mark than that of the registered proprietor of a trademark who is granted registration later. It highlights the key requirements that a prior user is required to meet and what the Courts consider in determining whether the ‘use’ requirements are satisfied. The article also discusses a few examples of evidentiary documentation that can be used...
The proposed taxation regime and the requirements under the Companies Act, 2013 are in line with the updated guidance for virtual assets issued by Financial Action Task Force, an inter-governmental organisation in October 2021. Elaborating on the new tax regime, the author also deliberates upon how different countries across the world are regulating and taxing crypto currency transactions…
The legislature has time and again introduced various income-tax benefits and incentives to encourage fresh investments and stimulate the economic growth. These incentives are generally given to new businesses in form of tax holidays, concessional tax rates or additional deductions.
On 14 December 2021, a dispute settlement panel of the World Trade Organization (‘WTO’) circulated its report concerning the subsidies allegedly granted and maintained by India in respect of sugar domestically produced and exported from India.
The year 2021 has been quite enriching for the competition law regime in India with multiple investigations ordered into varied sectors such as technology, sports, cinema and automobile. The year ended with the Competition Commission of India (“CCI") directing an investigation into allegations of abuse of dominance by Apple in the market for app stores for iOS in India.
In a detailed judgment, the Single Judge of the Delhi High Court rejected the challenge to the validity of the suit patent raised by the Defendants, as they had failed to establish a credible challenge concerning its validity.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. v. CCE, Calcutta (‘Westinghouse decision’) evoked an intriguing discussion on the classification of ‘relays’ used as part of Railway signalling systems.
Business dynamics requires a company to adopt various models of transactions. The nature and manner of executing such transactions is decided by them considering many business factors.
The Covid-19 pandemic severely impacted the functionality of both government and citizens right from early 2020. Due to lockdowns and other preventive measures announced by the Government of India (‘GOI’), both taxman and taxpayers were unable to function normally.
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ACCEPT', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy.
