Noting that the adjudication order did not record that the rig was in operation within the territorial waters of India, or that the rig did not operate outside the territorial waters of India, Supreme Court has set aside the demand of duty on said rig, brought in India for the purpose of repairs and subsequently sent out.
The Court was of the view that mere repair of a vessel is not putting the vessel to use in India and would not result in home consumption.
Department’s plea of taxable import, considering the fact that there was release of foreign exchange and grant of various approval and import licence, was rejected by the Court in the case Commissioner v. Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Ltd., holding that for deciding the question whether the rig was imported into India, the requirement of home consumption has to be satisfied.
Related Articles

Customs, DGFT and Section 28AAA: A clarification that creates confusion
Rohan Muralidharan+104 Nov 2026

India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement: Key things to note
Srinidhi Ganeshan+130 Sept 2026
Discuss this topic with our Customs team
Contact Us
